↓ Skip to main content

Review of high-content screening applications in toxicology

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Review of high-content screening applications in toxicology
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00204-019-02593-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuaizhang Li, Menghang Xia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Master 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#11,070,582
of 13,949,300 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,621
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,362
of 262,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,949,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.