↓ Skip to main content

Can tailored nanoceria act as a prebiotic? Report on improved lipid profile and gut microbiota in obese mice

Overview of attention for article published in The EPMA Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Can tailored nanoceria act as a prebiotic? Report on improved lipid profile and gut microbiota in obese mice
Published in
The EPMA Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13167-019-00190-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rostyslav Bubnov, Lidiia Babenko, Liudmyla Lazarenko, Maryna Kryvtsova, Oleksandr Shcherbakov, Nadiya Zholobak, Olga Golubnitschaja, Mykola Spivak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#10,736,849
of 14,131,022 outputs
Outputs from The EPMA Journal
#159
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,060
of 315,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The EPMA Journal
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,131,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.