| Title |
Life Sciences for Philosophers and Philosophy for Life Scientists: What Should We Teach?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Theory, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13752-019-00333-7 |
| Authors |
Giovanni Boniolo, Raffaella Campaner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| France | 4 | 9% |
| Austria | 3 | 7% |
| Turkey | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Congo | 1 | 2% |
| Bhutan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 55% |
| Scientists | 16 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 35% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,432,204
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from Biological Theory
#17
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,139
of 369,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Theory
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.