↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of meaningful change in bowel movement frequency for patients with carcinoid syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of meaningful change in bowel movement frequency for patients with carcinoid syndrome
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0153-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacie Hudgens, John Ramage, Matthew Kulke, Emily Bergsland, Lowell Anthony, Martyn Caplin, Kjell Öberg, Marianne Pavel, Jonathon Gable, Phillip Banks, Qi Melissa Yang, Pablo Lapuerta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,262,455
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#110
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,663
of 377,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.