@George4Tea @BoredEonist Try this: https://t.co/lpZeLoSsZW
@DonovanCleckley @byrne_a @kevinjhsu We addressed conditioning of paraphilias here: https://t.co/lpZeLoT0Pu
source for conditioning https://t.co/iFzQXv0vMi
@Sevens_2 @PigeonFeatherz @Aaron_GDAC Conditioning of paraphilias: Gotta be some role but probably not a big one. https://t.co/lpZeLoSsZW
@DerekPederson3 @clifford_banes @CathyYoung63 We wrote about this here: https://t.co/VhL6BKzjYl If there is a paywall problem and you'd like to read it, let me know.
RT @King_Mix_Papper: "Las botas son vistas como tal vez el más fetichista de todos los calzados y también pueden ser el atuendo de ropa con…
@bettytasticss @billmaher "Innate" isn't the same as "completely heritable." Read section beginning on page 62 here: https://t.co/Kp1mdmSnj6 Regarding paraphilias, read this (if you can; and if you can't, send me your email address for a copy): https://t.c
@Techruptor @DrDavidLey @JamesCantorPhD @DrDebraSoh @JoshuaGrubbsPhD Well no one knows for sure. But "early trauma in childhood" is a causal bust for just about everything. Perhaps read this: https://t.co/htEOX8LaHd
@aNonnaMiss1 @IsleLesbos @ZUCKERKJ I’m skeptical about a role for learning: https://t.co/VhL6BKzjYl
@gugolpleks @Display_Geek @aNonnaMiss1 @THEREALRIKKI5 @BlanchardPhD @CaptainMelToxic Very skeptical about conditioning explanations: https://t.co/VhL6BKzjYl
._. Me preocupa tener una gran cantidad de oc con botas xd. Esta es la faena más random que vi en mi vida
RT @King_Mix_Papper: "Las botas son vistas como tal vez el más fetichista de todos los calzados y también pueden ser el atuendo de ropa con…
RT @King_Mix_Papper: "Las botas son vistas como tal vez el más fetichista de todos los calzados y también pueden ser el atuendo de ropa con…
"Las botas son vistas como tal vez el más fetichista de todos los calzados y también pueden ser el atuendo de ropa con fines fetichistas más popular" (https://t.co/3akhnzfKMW) https://t.co/gp7lNeh5RU
RT @DegenRolf: Pavlovian learning (classical conditioning) cannot explain why men fetishize furries or women’s boots. https://t.co/2uWpY4J8…
@bobdaduck I rather doubt that fetishism is learned. I know, it appears plausible and self-evident, but the data do not lend support to the intuition. for example: https://t.co/b08FzsXklg
"A colleague interviewed a practitioner of autoerotic asphyxiation whose interest in the activity began immediately after hearing of a suicide by hanging." https://t.co/oec2WJcmQK
Siglo XXI: La psicología se propone estudiar a los furries.
RT @BlanchardPhD: New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (201…
RT @BlanchardPhD: New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (201…
RT @DrXaverius: Ha llegado el caso definitivo de cosa Que El Conductismo No Explica: los furries https://t.co/a8tT5IENVV
RT @DrXaverius: Ha llegado el caso definitivo de cosa Que El Conductismo No Explica: los furries https://t.co/a8tT5IENVV
RT @DrXaverius: Ha llegado el caso definitivo de cosa Que El Conductismo No Explica: los furries https://t.co/a8tT5IENVV
RT @BlanchardPhD: New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (201…
RT @BlanchardPhD: New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (201…
RT @DrXaverius: Ha llegado el caso definitivo de cosa Que El Conductismo No Explica: los furries https://t.co/a8tT5IENVV
RT @BlanchardPhD: New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (201…
RT @profjmb: Thoughts welcome https://t.co/WQzoYAhA4N
I think this links to the article: https://t.co/yIttWXW0hn
Thoughts welcome
RT @DrXaverius: Ha llegado el caso definitivo de cosa Que El Conductismo No Explica: los furries https://t.co/a8tT5IENVV
RT @BlanchardPhD: New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (201…
New article by @kevinjhsu and @profjmb: The Poverty of Conditioning Explanations for Sexual Interests: Reply to Grey (2019). https://t.co/IZxzwDep2j https://t.co/blHE92zyGr
RT @DegenRolf: Pavlovian learning (classical conditioning) cannot explain why men fetishize furries or women’s boots. https://t.co/2uWpY4J8…
Ha llegado el caso definitivo de cosa Que El Conductismo No Explica: los furries https://t.co/a8tT5IENVV
RT @DegenRolf: Pavlovian learning (classical conditioning) cannot explain why men fetishize furries or women’s boots. https://t.co/2uWpY4J8…
RT @DegenRolf: Pavlovian learning (classical conditioning) cannot explain why men fetishize furries or women’s boots. https://t.co/2uWpY4J8…
Some men!!
RT @DegenRolf: Pavlovian learning (classical conditioning) cannot explain why men fetishize furries or women’s boots. https://t.co/2uWpY4J8…
Pavlovian learning (classical conditioning) cannot explain why men fetishize furries or women’s boots. https://t.co/2uWpY4J8TN https://t.co/KfjUr5VJZD