↓ Skip to main content

A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data

Overview of attention for article published in Knowledge & Information Systems, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data
Published in
Knowledge & Information Systems, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10115-012-0487-8
Authors

Verónica Bolón-Canedo, Noelia Sánchez-Maroño, Amparo Alonso-Betanzos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 259 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 34%
Student > Master 63 23%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 16 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 146 53%
Engineering 57 21%
Mathematics 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 36 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2012.
All research outputs
#2,018,132
of 3,635,018 outputs
Outputs from Knowledge & Information Systems
#15
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,673
of 73,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knowledge & Information Systems
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,635,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.