↓ Skip to main content

Language impairment in primary progressive aphasia and other neurodegenerative diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 673)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Language impairment in primary progressive aphasia and other neurodegenerative diseases
Published in
Journal of Genetics, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12041-019-1139-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. R. Rahul, R. Joseph Ponniah

Abstract

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that disrupts the language capacity of an individual by selectively affecting the language network of brain. Although aphasic literature is replete with reports of brain damage responsible for various types of PPA, it does not provide a comprehensive understanding of whether PPA is an independent pathological condition or an atypical syndrome of neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). To address this ambiguity, we provide a detailed description of PPA, its variants and their brain anatomy. Subsequently, we unravel the relationship between PPA and NDDs like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Dyslexia. To substantiate the relationship further, we also provide a brief account of their genetic aetiology. In the final section, we offer an exhaustive approach towards the treatment of PPA by combining the existing language the rapies with clinical and pharmacological interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Professor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Linguistics 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,412,937
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetics
#19
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,784
of 372,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.