↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: The two-loop energy–momentum tensor within the gradient-flow formalism

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Erratum to: The two-loop energy–momentum tensor within the gradient-flow formalism
Published in
European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, October 2019
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7327-x
Authors

Robert V. Harlander, Yannick Kluth, Fabian Lange

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#12,259,616
of 13,855,967 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#3,512
of 4,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,509
of 241,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#13
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,855,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,497 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.