↓ Skip to main content

Wealth and the effect of subjective survival probability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Population Economics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Wealth and the effect of subjective survival probability
Published in
Journal of Population Economics, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00148-019-00749-2
Authors

Sanna Nivakoski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Researcher 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 50%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#12,511,446
of 14,150,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Economics
#437
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,238
of 317,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Economics
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,150,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.