↓ Skip to main content

A ‘cutt’ above the rest: theory, practice, and challenges of naming species of iconic trout

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
A ‘cutt’ above the rest: theory, practice, and challenges of naming species of iconic trout
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10641-019-00922-2
Authors

Thomas F. Turner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#11,213,295
of 14,143,289 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#882
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,019
of 317,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,143,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.