↓ Skip to main content

Identification of glycyrrhizin metabolites in humans and of a potential biomarker of liquorice-induced pseudoaldosteronism: a multi-centre cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Identification of glycyrrhizin metabolites in humans and of a potential biomarker of liquorice-induced pseudoaldosteronism: a multi-centre cross-sectional study
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00204-019-02588-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kanon Takahashi, Tetsuhiro Yoshino, Yasuhito Maki, Kan’ichiro Ishiuchi, Takao Namiki, Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai, Kiyoshi Minamizawa, Toshiaki Makino, Tomonori Nakamura, Masaru Mimura, Kenji Watanabe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,889,208
of 13,668,802 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,430
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,697
of 176,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,668,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.