| Title |
Relationship between ‘on-treatment platelet reactivity’, shear stress, and micro-embolic signals in asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-019-09550-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. J. X. Murphy, S. T. Lim, J. A. Kinsella, S. Tierney, B. Egan, T. M. Feeley, S. M. Murphy, R. A. Walsh, D. R. Collins, T. Coughlan, D. O’Neill, J. A. Harbison, P. Madhavan, S. M. O’Neill, M. P. Colgan, D. Cox, N. Moran, G. Hamilton, J. F. Meaney, D. J. H. McCabe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,519,688
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,841
of 4,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,340
of 360,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#35
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.