↓ Skip to main content

Neurobiological evaluation of thirty-one medicinal plant extracts using microtiter enzyme assays

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Phytoscience, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Neurobiological evaluation of thirty-one medicinal plant extracts using microtiter enzyme assays
Published in
Clinical Phytoscience, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40816-016-0023-6
Authors

Ilkay Erdogan Orhan, Fatma Sezer Senol, Mehmet Zeki Haznedaroglu, Halil Koyu, Sinem Aslan Erdem, Gulderen Yılmaz, Mehmet Cicek, A. Emre Yaprak, Esin Ari, Nurgun Kucukboyaci, Gulnur Toker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,322,106
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#52
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,570
of 299,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them