↓ Skip to main content

The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: educators’ and architects’ perceptions

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Educational Researcher (Australian Association for Research in Education), November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
Title
The affordances of innovative learning environments for deep learning: educators’ and architects’ perceptions
Published in
Australian Educational Researcher (Australian Association for Research in Education), November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13384-019-00354-y
Authors

Fiona Young, Benjamin Cleveland, Wesley Imms

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,482,071
of 13,887,828 outputs
Outputs from Australian Educational Researcher (Australian Association for Research in Education)
#73
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,687
of 241,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Educational Researcher (Australian Association for Research in Education)
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,887,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.