↓ Skip to main content

Effect of progressive resistance training on persistent pain after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Effect of progressive resistance training on persistent pain after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10549-019-05461-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunn Ammitzbøll, Kenneth Geving Andersen, Pernille Envold Bidstrup, Christoffer Johansen, Charlotte Lanng, Niels Kroman, Bo Zerahn, Ole Hyldegaard, Elisabeth Wreford Andersen, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,235,939
of 13,652,101 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,978
of 3,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,250
of 168,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,652,101 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.