↓ Skip to main content

Web of Science and Scopus language coverage

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
Title
Web of Science and Scopus language coverage
Published in
Scientometrics, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
Authors

Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta, Michael Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#507,117
of 13,801,769 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#88
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,965
of 228,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,801,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.