Title |
Some germinal roots of AI and their impact on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11548-019-02069-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heinz U. Lemke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,257,499
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#66
of 862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,461
of 353,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 862 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.