↓ Skip to main content

Reduction mammoplasty and back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Reduction mammoplasty and back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
European Spine Journal, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00586-019-06155-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan Mian, Edward Dyson, Christian Ulbricht

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,639,260
of 13,777,258 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,430
of 3,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,355
of 227,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#54
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,777,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.