Correcting the scientific record should a much faster process. This is a better example of failed peer review than a paper from a Nobel prize winner getting rejected for insufficient advance.
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
"even though their tongues are apparently all hanging out at the height of her heels" 😆😆😆
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
Slowly but steadily dodgy research is being identified and corrected. Great development!
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
RT @Neuro_Skeptic: "High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodg…
"High Heels Increase Women's Attractiveness" has been retracted https://t.co/UMyqlWsYel RIP in peace you legend (of dodgy science) https://t.co/NDL7TKUSs7 @sTeamTraen @jamesheathers https://t.co/SqyC68BGL1
RT @sTeamTraen: I feel slightly bad for @tashahinde, who wrote up this now-retracted paper in 2014; the subs put the headline "High Heels I…
RT @StevenSalzberg1: Retraction: it turns out that the study claiming high heels make women look more attractive was bogus. Looks like the…
RT @StevenSalzberg1: Retraction: it turns out that the study claiming high heels make women look more attractive was bogus. Looks like the…
RT @StevenSalzberg1: Retraction: it turns out that the study claiming high heels make women look more attractive was bogus. Looks like the…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @StevenSalzberg1: Retraction: it turns out that the study claiming high heels make women look more attractive was bogus. Looks like the…
RT @StevenSalzberg1: Retraction: it turns out that the study claiming high heels make women look more attractive was bogus. Looks like the…
Retraction: it turns out that the study claiming high heels make women look more attractive was bogus. Looks like the authors manipulated data to get the "sexy" result. h/t @RetractionWatch @jamesheathers https://t.co/ZhRhEjhNoT
RT @DegenRolf: Study by French "wunderkind" showing that men approached women more quickly and helped them more the higher their heels is r…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
The idea that in 2015 someone could still publish a fantasy set of data about the difference high heels make is disturbing. Kudos to @sTeamTraen for pointing out all the indications the study was faked.
RT @sTeamTraen: I feel slightly bad for @tashahinde, who wrote up this now-retracted paper in 2014; the subs put the headline "High Heels I…
⬇️
I feel slightly bad for @tashahinde, who wrote up this now-retracted paper in 2014; the subs put the headline "High Heels Increase A Woman's Attractiveness, And For Once It's Not A Bogus Survey" on it.🤦♂️ https://t.co/NGY2pU71IO Hey @HuffPostUK, any cha
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @DegenRolf: Study by French "wunderkind" showing that men approached women more quickly and helped them more the higher their heels is r…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @sTeamTraen: Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
Earlier this week, @jamesheathers noted that Hans Eysenck could end up with 61 retractions if all of his dodgy publications were properly investigated: https://t.co/7F9KABMMYr Guéguen has 339 published articles. #JustSayin
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
Study by French "wunderkind" showing that men approached women more quickly and helped them more the higher their heels is retracted due to methodological errors. https://t.co/3wLocTRefn The story behind the retraction https://t.co/jG1R0fWZMx https://t.co/
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @jamesheathers: It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it ca…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
It will be four years in November since we became interested in that paper for being ... unusual. That's how long it can take. But tell me again about that 'science is self-correcting' business you're so hot about.
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
RT @sTeamTraen: A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retra…
A month shy of four years since @JamesHeathers and I started looking at the work of Nicolas Guéguen, he has his first retraction (https://t.co/Aw8sbZQflN), concerning a paper that we blogged about in December 2017 (https://t.co/Wvu0u5l6E8). https://t.co/sM