↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0589-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongmin Zhang, Qing Zhang, Xiukai Chen, Xiaoting Wang, Dawei Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,583,130
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#838
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,759
of 351,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.