↓ Skip to main content

Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
71 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0584-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Le Conte, Nicolas Terzi, Guillaume Mortamet, Fekri Abroug, Guillaume Carteaux, Céline Charasse, Anthony Chauvin, Xavier Combes, Stéphane Dauger, Alexandre Demoule, Thibaut Desmettre, Stephan Ehrmann, Bénédicte Gaillard-Le Roux, Valérie Hamel, Boris Jung, Sabrina Kepka, Erwan L’Her, Mikaël Martinez, Christophe Milési, Élise Morawiec, Mathieu Oberlin, Patrick Plaisance, Robin Pouyau, Chantal Raherison, Patrick Ray, Mathieu Schmidt, Arnaud W. Thille, Jennifer Truchot, Guillaume Valdenaire, Julien Vaux, Damien Viglino, Guillaume Voiriot, Bénédicte Vrignaud, Sandrine Jean, Eric Mariotte, Pierre-Géraud Claret

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 45 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 48 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#980,151
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#106
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,213
of 367,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.