↓ Skip to main content

Building the second version of the World Digital Magnetic Anomaly Map (WDMAM)

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Building the second version of the World Digital Magnetic Anomaly Map (WDMAM)
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0404-6
Authors

Vincent Lesur, Mohamed Hamoudi, Yujin Choi, Jérôme Dyment, Erwan Thébault

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 13 24%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 57%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,747,984
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#315
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,707
of 312,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.