| Title |
Assessing left ventricular systolic function with ejection fraction: using a double-edged knife as a hammer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0582-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Ignacio Monge García, Maurizio Cecconi, Michael R. Pinsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Egypt | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,829,314
of 25,081,419 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#722
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,118
of 356,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,419 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.