↓ Skip to main content

Phosgene‐induced acute lung injury (ALI): differences from chlorine‐induced ALI and attempts to translate toxicology to clinical medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Phosgene‐induced acute lung injury (ALI): differences from chlorine‐induced ALI and attempts to translate toxicology to clinical medicine
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40169-017-0149-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenli Li, Juergen Pauluhn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 20%
Researcher 5 20%
Other 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Chemistry 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,523,434
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#466
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,410
of 331,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.