↓ Skip to main content

Dissection and cytological mapping of chromosome arm 4VS by the development of wheat-Haynaldia villosa structural aberration library

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical & Applied Genetics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Dissection and cytological mapping of chromosome arm 4VS by the development of wheat-Haynaldia villosa structural aberration library
Published in
Theoretical & Applied Genetics, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00122-019-03452-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keli Dai, Renhui Zhao, Miaomiao Shi, Jin Xiao, Zhongyu Yu, Qi Jia, Zongkuan Wang, Chunxia Yuan, Haojie Sun, Aizhong Cao, Ruiqi Zhang, Peidu Chen, Yingbo Li, Haiyan Wang, Xiue Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#11,177,021
of 14,093,691 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical & Applied Genetics
#1,939
of 2,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,379
of 263,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical & Applied Genetics
#33
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.