↓ Skip to main content

Giant hiatus hernia: closure of the difficult hiatus

Overview of attention for article published in European Surgery: ACA Acta Chirurgica Austriaca, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Giant hiatus hernia: closure of the difficult hiatus
Published in
European Surgery: ACA Acta Chirurgica Austriaca, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10353-019-00612-4
Authors

Gregory L. Falk, Trevor J. D’Netto, Sophia C. Little

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,831,234
of 14,093,691 outputs
Outputs from European Surgery: ACA Acta Chirurgica Austriaca
#65
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,785
of 263,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Surgery: ACA Acta Chirurgica Austriaca
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.