↓ Skip to main content

Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, August 2019
DOI 10.3758/s13423-019-01651-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa K. Fazio, David G. Rand, Gordon Pennycook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 33%
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 58%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Computer Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#834,888
of 14,155,721 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#177
of 1,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,154
of 262,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,155,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.