Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/hugELdTcyK
RT @SpringerEthics: New open access article Minerva Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? ht…
RT @OpenScienceR: Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/Coh5uqG6jJ https://t.co/1m…
RT @RIPRJournal: Adoption of new editorial procedures is very slow and restricted to specific niches in academic publishing, shows survey o…
Interesting. From the point of view of a previous journal ed, I’d suggest this is because meaningful adoption, as opposed to ideas, is very hard to do.
RT @NRIN_Integrity: https://t.co/reLkNTCqxK Nice article by Serge Horbach.. There is a long road to improve peer review
https://t.co/reLkNTCqxK Nice article by Serge Horbach.. There is a long road to improve peer review
RT @OpenScienceR: Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/Coh5uqG6jJ https://t.co/1m…
RT @OpenScienceR: Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/Coh5uqG6jJ https://t.co/1m…
RT @OpenScienceR: Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/Coh5uqG6jJ https://t.co/1m…
Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/Coh5uqG6jJ https://t.co/1m8bUFXF1A
RT @RIPRJournal: Adoption of new editorial procedures is very slow and restricted to specific niches in academic publishing, shows survey o…
RT @RIPRJournal: Adoption of new editorial procedures is very slow and restricted to specific niches in academic publishing, shows survey o…
RT @RIPRJournal: Adoption of new editorial procedures is very slow and restricted to specific niches in academic publishing, shows survey o…
RT @RIPRJournal: Adoption of new editorial procedures is very slow and restricted to specific niches in academic publishing, shows survey o…
Adoption of new editorial procedures is very slow and restricted to specific niches in academic publishing, shows survey of journal editors #peerreview https://t.co/7SjopEBG4r
RT @WillemHalffman: Scholarly journal review procedures are full of innovation, yet also relatively conservative: with the exception of pla…
Scholarly journal review procedures are full of innovation, yet also relatively conservative: with the exception of plagiarism scanners, fiercely advocated experiments in peer review remain limited to niches in the scientific publication system. https://t.
RT @SpringerEthics: New open access article Minerva Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? ht…
New open access article Minerva Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? https://t.co/CSCmsfh3or https://t.co/8BHV1izokg