↓ Skip to main content

Carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of gliomas: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of gliomas: a review
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11060-019-03303-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy D. Malouff, Jennifer L. Peterson, Anita Mahajan, Daniel M. Trifiletti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,205,348
of 14,061,535 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#856
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,888
of 262,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#44
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,061,535 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.