↓ Skip to main content

Intraperitoneal Invasion of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Risk Factor for Dismal Prognosis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Intraperitoneal Invasion of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Risk Factor for Dismal Prognosis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07615-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eran Nizri, Marco Fiore, Francesco Barretta, Chiara Colombo, Stefano Radaelli, Dario Callegaro, Roberta Sanfilippo, Claudia Sangalli, Paola Collini, Silvia Stacchiotti, Paolo G. Casali, Rosalba Miceli, Alessandro Gronchi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,485,182
of 13,735,692 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#953
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,974
of 216,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#62
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,735,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.