↓ Skip to main content

MGMT immunohistochemistry in pituitary tumors: controversies with clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Pituitary, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
MGMT immunohistochemistry in pituitary tumors: controversies with clinical implications
Published in
Pituitary, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11102-019-00993-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Kontogeorgos, Eleni Thodou, Mary Koutourousiou, Gregory Kaltsas, Andreas Seretis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,438,560
of 13,903,141 outputs
Outputs from Pituitary
#115
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,016
of 251,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pituitary
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,903,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.