↓ Skip to main content

A tale of pituitary adenomas: to NET or not to NET

Overview of attention for article published in Pituitary, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
A tale of pituitary adenomas: to NET or not to NET
Published in
Pituitary, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11102-019-00988-2
Authors

Ken K. Y. Ho, Maria Fleseriu, John Wass, Aart van der Lely, Ariel Barkan, Andrea Giustina, Felipe F. Casanueva, Anthony P. Heaney, Nienke Biermasz, Christian Strasburger, Shlomo Melmed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,605,566
of 13,716,038 outputs
Outputs from Pituitary
#135
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,646
of 206,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pituitary
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,716,038 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.