↓ Skip to main content

A tale of pituitary adenomas: to NET or not to NET

Overview of attention for article published in Pituitary, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
A tale of pituitary adenomas: to NET or not to NET
Published in
Pituitary, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11102-019-00988-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken K. Y. Ho, Maria Fleseriu, John Wass, Aart van der Lely, Ariel Barkan, Andrea Giustina, Felipe F. Casanueva, Anthony P. Heaney, Nienke Biermasz, Christian Strasburger, Shlomo Melmed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,819,867
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Pituitary
#351
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,433
of 349,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pituitary
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.