↓ Skip to main content

Modelling Forced Vital Capacity in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Optimising Trial Design

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Modelling Forced Vital Capacity in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Optimising Trial Design
Published in
Advances in Therapy, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12325-019-01093-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Santermans, Paul Ford, Michael Kreuter, Nadia Verbruggen, Paul Meyvisch, Wim A. Wuyts, Kevin K. Brown, David J. Lederer, Adam J. Byrne, Philip L. Molyneaux, Arunon Sivananthan, Catharina C. Moor, Toby M. Maher, Marlies Wijsenbeek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,360,998
of 13,726,653 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#447
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,542
of 212,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#19
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,726,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.