↓ Skip to main content

Uniting the living through the dead: how voluntary associations made death a selective benefit

Overview of attention for article published in Interest Groups & Advocacy, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Uniting the living through the dead: how voluntary associations made death a selective benefit
Published in
Interest Groups & Advocacy, August 2019
DOI 10.1057/s41309-019-00071-y
Authors

Adam Chamberlain, Alixandra B. Yanus, Nicholas Pyeatt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,785,429
of 23,664,651 outputs
Outputs from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#127
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,288
of 342,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interest Groups & Advocacy
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,664,651 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.