| Title |
[18F]-AV-1451 tau PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and suspected non-AD tauopathies using a late acquisition time window
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-019-09530-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Lagarde, Pauline Olivieri, Fabien Caillé, Philippe Gervais, Jean-Claude Baron, Michel Bottlaender, Marie Sarazin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 20% |
| Psychology | 3 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,257,217
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,022
of 4,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,595
of 342,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#26
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.