↓ Skip to main content

The comparison of the effect of corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of plantar fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
The comparison of the effect of corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of plantar fasciitis
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00402-012-1488-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ertuğrul Akşahin, Dağhan Doğruyol, Halil Yalçın Yüksel, Onur Hapa, Özgür Doğan, Levent Çelebi, Ali Biçimoğlu

Abstract

In this study, the results of local injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and corticosteroids in the treatment of plantar fasciitis were compared.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Other 9 13%
Unspecified 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 69%
Unspecified 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#2,015,203
of 3,632,750 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery
#51
of 130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,348
of 73,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,632,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them