↓ Skip to main content

Rates of $$D^{*}_{0}(2400)$$D0∗(2400), $$ D_J^*(3000) $$DJ∗(3000) as the $$D^{*}_{0}(2P)$$D0∗(2P) and $$D^{*}_{0}(3P)$$D0∗(3P) in B decays

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Rates of $$D^{*}_{0}(2400)$$D0∗(2400), $$ D_J^*(3000) $$DJ∗(3000) as the $$D^{*}_{0}(2P)$$D0∗(2P) and $$D^{*}_{0}(3P)$$D0∗(3P) in B decays
Published in
European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, September 2019
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7305-3
Authors

Xiao-Ze Tan, Yue Jiang, Tianhong Wang, Tian Zhou, Geng Li, Zi-Kan Geng, Guo-Li Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,561,081
of 13,699,002 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#1,449
of 4,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,412
of 202,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#12
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,699,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.