| Title |
Prospective cohort study of early biosignatures of response to lithium in bipolar-I-disorders: overview of the H2020-funded R-LiNK initiative
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40345-019-0156-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Scott, Diego Hidalgo-Mazzei, Rebecca Strawbridge, Allan Young, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, Bruno Etain, Ole A. Andreassen, Michael Bauer, Djamila Bennabi, Andrew M. Blamire, Fawzi Boumezbeur, Paolo Brambilla, Nadia Cattane, Annamaria Cattaneo, Marie Chupin, Klara Coello, Yann Cointepas, Francesc Colom, David A. Cousins, Caroline Dubertret, Edouard Duchesnay, Adele Ferro, Aitana Garcia-Estela, Jose Goikolea, Antoine Grigis, Emmanuel Haffen, Margrethe C. Høegh, Petter Jakobsen, Janos L. Kalman, Lars V. Kessing, Farah Klohn-Saghatolislam, Trine V. Lagerberg, Mikael Landén, Ute Lewitzka, Ashley Lutticke, Nicolas Mazer, Monica Mazzelli, Cristina Mora, Thorsten Muller, Estanislao Mur-Mila, Ketil Joachim Oedegaard, Leif Oltedal, Erik Pålsson, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Sergi Papiol, Victor Perez-Sola, Andreas Reif, Philipp Ritter, Roberto Rossi, Thomas Schulze, Fanny Senner, Fiona E. Smith, Letizia Squarcina, Nils Eiel Steen, Pete E. Thelwall, Cristina Varo, Eduard Vieta, Maj Vinberg, Michele Wessa, Lars T. Westlye, Frank Bellivier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Psychology | 16 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,826,079
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#150
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,506
of 345,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.