↓ Skip to main content

Protecting livestock, protecting livelihoods: the Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards (LEGS)

Overview of attention for article published in Pastoralism, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Protecting livestock, protecting livelihoods: the Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards (LEGS)
Published in
Pastoralism, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/2041-7136-1-9
Authors

Cathy Watson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Social Sciences 6 21%
Computer Science 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Pastoralism
#113
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,421
of 121,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pastoralism
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.