↓ Skip to main content

Associations of circulating and dietary vitamin D with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes and Control, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Associations of circulating and dietary vitamin D with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
Published in
Cancer Causes and Control, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10552-010-9706-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Gilbert, Richard M. Martin, Rebecca Beynon, Ross Harris, Jelena Savovic, Luisa Zuccolo, Geertruida E. Bekkering, William D. Fraser, Jonathan A. C. Sterne, Chris Metcalfe

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 23%
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Unspecified 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Unspecified 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,994,129
of 8,014,601 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes and Control
#433
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,816
of 273,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes and Control
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,014,601 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.