| Title |
Best-worst scaling improves measurement of first impressions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41235-019-0183-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nichola Burton, Michael Burton, Dan Rigby, Clare A. M. Sutherland, Gillian Rhodes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 27% |
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,953,982
of 24,450,293 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#159
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,314
of 349,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,450,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.