↓ Skip to main content

Factors leading to postoperative pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients including sagittal alignment and lumbar disc degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Factors leading to postoperative pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients including sagittal alignment and lumbar disc degeneration
Published in
European Spine Journal, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00586-019-06152-5
Authors

Tetsuhiko Mimura, Shota Ikegami, Hiroki Oba, Masashi Uehara, Michihiko Koseki, Jun Takahashi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Unspecified 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,151,142
of 14,061,535 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,981
of 3,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,452
of 261,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#64
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,061,535 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,449 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.