↓ Skip to main content

Financial stress after critical illness: an unintended consequence of high-intensity care

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Financial stress after critical illness: an unintended consequence of high-intensity care
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00134-019-05781-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nita Khandelwal, Peter May, J. Randall Curtis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,084,952
of 14,083,883 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,030
of 3,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,807
of 261,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#61
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,083,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.