↓ Skip to main content

Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Banking, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 165)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Why people donate their brain to science: a systematic review
Published in
Cell and Tissue Banking, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10561-019-09786-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng-Jiun Penny Lin, Tanisha Jowsey, Maurice A. Curtis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,964,568
of 14,054,727 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Banking
#6
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,162
of 261,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Banking
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,054,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them