↓ Skip to main content

The omics approach to bee nutritional landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The omics approach to bee nutritional landscape
Published in
Metabolomics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11306-019-1590-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyadarshini Chakrabarti, Jeffery T. Morré, Hannah M. Lucas, Claudia S. Maier, Ramesh R. Sagili

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 33%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,811,738
of 14,064,191 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#663
of 951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,231
of 261,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,064,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.