↓ Skip to main content

Experimental cryoconite holes as mesocosms for studying community ecology

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Experimental cryoconite holes as mesocosms for studying community ecology
Published in
Polar Biology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00300-019-02572-7
Authors

Pacifica Sommers, Dorota L. Porazinska, John L. Darcy, Felix Zamora, Andrew G. Fountain, Steven K. Schmidt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 12 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Environmental Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 9%
Unknown 13 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,554,753
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#1,106
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,689
of 317,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.