↓ Skip to main content

Conservation planning following reclamation of intertidal areas throughout the Yellow and Bohai Seas, China

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Conservation planning following reclamation of intertidal areas throughout the Yellow and Bohai Seas, China
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10531-019-01851-3
Authors

Houlang Duan, Shaoxia Xia, Xiyong Hou, Yu Liu, Xiubo Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,696,286
of 13,640,858 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#985
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,340
of 186,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.