↓ Skip to main content

Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 473)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13164-019-00446-9
Authors

James D. Grayot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 63 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 7%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 69 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,604,775
of 25,054,308 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#36
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,925
of 319,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,054,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them