↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of surgical treatment for gastrointestinal cancers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
The evolution of surgical treatment for gastrointestinal cancers
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10147-019-01499-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihiko Maehara, Yuji Soejima, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Naoyuki Kawahara, Eiji Oki, Hiroshi Saeki, Tomohiko Akahoshi, Toru Ikegami, Yo-ichi Yamashita, Tadashi Furuyama, Keishi Sugimachi, Noboru Harada, Tetsuzo Tagawa, Norifumi Harimoto, Shinji Itoh, Hideto Sonoda, Koji Ando, Yuichiro Nakashima, Yoshihiro Nagao, Nami Yamashita, Yuta Kasagi, Takafumi Yukaya, Takeshi Kurihara, Ryosuke Tsutsumi, Shinkichi Takamori, Shun Sasaki, Tetsuo Ikeda, Yoshikazu Yonemitsu, Takasuke Fukuhara, Hiroyuki Kitao, Makoto Iimori, Yuki Kataoka, Takeshi Wakasa, Masami Suzuki, Koji Teraishi, Yasuto Yoshida, Masaki Mori

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,863,039
of 13,635,041 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#277
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,399
of 171,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them