↓ Skip to main content

Process optimization in total knee arthoplasty procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Die Orthopädie, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Process optimization in total knee arthoplasty procedures
Published in
Die Orthopädie, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00132-019-03803-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian C. von Eiff, Wilfried von Eiff, Andreas Roth, Mohamed Ghanem

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Librarian 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 60%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Orthopädie
#276
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,489
of 351,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Orthopädie
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.